Am I safe to assume that LORAWAN_TX_POWER TX_POWER_0 implies less transmitting power than LORAWAN_TX_POWER TX_POWER_15?
I’m looking to reduce the transmitter power.
Thanks,
Frank
Am I safe to assume that LORAWAN_TX_POWER TX_POWER_0 implies less transmitting power than LORAWAN_TX_POWER TX_POWER_15?
I’m looking to reduce the transmitter power.
Thanks,
Frank
@FranklinsAce , Welcome to the RAK forum.
And welcome to the sometimes confusing world of LoRaWAN definitions.
TX Power 0 is the strongest signal
TX Power 15 is the weakest signal
You can find here an overview per Region:
Thank you, very helpful. A couple of follow-up questions:
RFU is reserved for future, they are not defined in the LoRaMAC stack.
The RAK4631 doesn’t have an AT command interface like the WisDuo modules. I just referred to it to show the assignment of TX power.
The RAK4631 comes without any firmware, just a bootloader. WisBlock is designed as open source, leaving the firmware development to you. But we have many examples in our WisBlock repository WisBlock/examples at master · RAKWireless/WisBlock · GitHub.
There you can find examples for all our WisBlock modules and LoRaWAN examples
Excellent, glad I asked. Thank you for your prompt reply