The RAK3172 RUI3 version control only specifies the latest, which I believe is version 4.2.0
The list only specifies ‘latest’ which could mean anything.
Why not specify the actual release number instead of ‘latest’. That would be more useful.
The History version doesn’t say anything about what RUI3 V4.2. what are the changes?
The reason why we us ‘Latest’ is because there are links to these firmware files in several parts of our documentation and for some of them even in our store.
Using a name that does not change when we release new versions prevents dead links and saves us time because we do not have to go through the whole documentation to replace the links everywhere.
But as an end user and a customer for your parts, it doesn’t help.
Sounds like to me that perhaps you need to rethink things, and have it more user friendly.